Loading…
Loading…
The State Street SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) charges a lower expense ratio than the Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RZG). RZG has delivered higher 1-year returns than SLYG, but also experienced a worse 5-year maximum drawdown.
ISCG offers lower fees and broader diversification, while RZG's portfolio strategy has outperformed over the past five years
RZG delivered stronger 1-year returns at 39.70%, but IJT's lower 0.18% expense ratio and $8.3B in assets offer cost advantages for long-term investors.
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF offers a significantly lower expense ratio than Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF. Invesco's ETF has delivered higher one-year total returns but lower five-year growth than the Vanguard fund.
The Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF offers a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.06% than the 0.35% charged by the Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF. The Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF focuses on small-cap stocks with strong momentum while the Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF targets large-cap market leaders.
Expense ratios, sector focus, and portfolio size set these two small-cap growth ETFs apart for investors weighing diversification and cost.
RZG charges higher fees and yields less than SLYG, but delivered stronger one-year returns as of March 2026 RZG's smaller assets under management and much lower trading volume could make large trades slower or more expensive Sector weights differ: RZG leans into healthcare while SLYG splits most between industrials, tech, and healthcare
ISCG charges a much lower expense ratio and is nearly eight times larger than RZG. Both funds delivered similar strong gains over the past year, but ISCG holds over seven times as many stocks, spreading risk more broadly.