Loading…
Loading…
The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in the securities that comprise the underlying index. The underlying index is composed of a subset of securities from the S&P SmallCap 600® Index that exhibit strong growth characteristics.
Is RZG's expense ratio expensive, average, or a steal for its category?
Pro reveals the verdict on a 5-tier spectrum calibrated against ICI 2025 industry averages, with strategy-aware bands so the comparison is meaningful.
The State Street SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) charges a lower expense ratio than the Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RZG). RZG has delivered higher 1-year returns than SLYG, but also experienced a worse 5-year maximum drawdown.
ISCG offers lower fees and broader diversification, while RZG's portfolio strategy has outperformed over the past five years
RZG delivered stronger 1-year returns at 39.70%, but IJT's lower 0.18% expense ratio and $8.3B in assets offer cost advantages for long-term investors.
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF offers a significantly lower expense ratio than Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF. Invesco's ETF has delivered higher one-year total returns but lower five-year growth than the Vanguard fund.
The Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF offers a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.06% than the 0.35% charged by the Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF. The Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth ETF focuses on small-cap stocks with strong momentum while the Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF targets large-cap market leaders.