Loading…
Loading…
See exactly how SPDW's revenue becomes profit — a Sankey that traces revenue (and its reported segments) through gross profit, operating expenses, and net profit, with the year-over-year change on every line.
The same diagram the Chart Builder draws, right on the Summary tab. Upgrade to unlock it for SPDW and 80,000+ other tickers.
This State Street SPDR Portfolio ETF is designed to mirror the total return performance of the S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index, before accounting for its fees and expenses. As a cost-effective foundational offering in the SPDR Portfolio series, it serves as a building block for broad, diversified exposure across core asset classes. The fund offers comprehensive access to developed international equity markets, specifically excluding the United States, which can help in diversifying and potentially reducing country-specific investment risks.
Samsung and SK Hynix are popular South Korean AI chip stocks, and SK just debuted on the Nasdaq. The three global ETFs below all include Samsung and SK Hynix as part of their top stock holdings.
The State Street SPDR Portfolio Developed World ex-US ETF has delivered 19.2% annualized returns for the past three years. Vanguard projects that developed market stocks (like the ones held by this ETF) might outperform U.S. stocks in the next 10 years.
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF offers comprehensive global coverage, including the United States, whereas State Street SPDR Portfolio Developed World ex-US ETF excludes American companies State Street SPDR Portfolio Developed World ex-US ETF maintains a lower expense ratio of 0.03%. Vanguard Total World Stock ETF holds more than 10,000 stocks, providing broader diversification than the 2,000-plus holdings in the State Street fund
The State Street SPDR Portfolio Developed World ex-US ETF offers a lower expense ratio and a higher dividend yield than the Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF. The State Street SPDR Portfolio Developed World ex-US ETF has delivered higher total returns over the past year and the last five years.
These two international ETFs take different approaches to global diversification -- if you can call it that.