Loading…
Loading…
The iShares MSCI World ETF aims to mirror the investment performance of a specific market benchmark. This index is entirely composed of stocks from companies located in developed global economies.
Is URTH's expense ratio expensive, average, or a steal for its category?
Pro reveals the verdict on a 5-tier spectrum calibrated against ICI 2025 industry averages, with strategy-aware bands so the comparison is meaningful.
iShares MSCI World ETF is significantly more affordable for long-term investors with an expense ratio of 0.24% compared to 0.72% for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF. iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF has delivered higher 1-year total returns but historically experiences greater volatility and deeper maximum drawdowns.
The Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF excludes U.S. equities, whereas the iShares MSCI World ETF includes them as part of its global strategy. The Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF is significantly more cost-efficient with a 0.03% expense ratio and a higher dividend yield.
The Vanguard Total World Stock ETF offers a significantly lower expense ratio than the iShares MSCI World ETF. The iShares MSCI World ETF focuses exclusively on developed markets, while the Vanguard Total World Stock ETF includes exposure to emerging economies.
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF offers a significantly lower expense ratio and a higher trailing-12-month dividend yield than iShares MSCI World ETF. iShares MSCI World ETF provides exposure to developed economies and has delivered higher 5-year growth with lower price volatility.
The State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) offers a lower expense ratio and a higher dividend yield than the iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH). While both funds hold tech giants as top positions, NZAC applies a specific climate screen and includes emerging markets.