Loading…
Loading…
The iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF aims to replicate the investment performance of a specific benchmark index. This index is made up of shares from smaller U.S. companies that are identified by their "value" characteristics.
Is IWN's expense ratio expensive, average, or a steal for its category?
Pro reveals the verdict on a 5-tier spectrum calibrated against ICI 2025 industry averages, with strategy-aware bands so the comparison is meaningful.
I initiate coverage of iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF with a buy rating, citing strong cyclical tailwinds and robust fundamentals. IWN outperformed small-cap and growth indices in 2026, benefiting from investor rotation into value and exposure to rate-sensitive sectors like financials and industrials. The ETF offers attractive valuations—forward P/E of 19x, price/book of 1.37—and a lower risk profile versus broader small-cap peers.
State Street SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF features a lower expense ratio and higher trailing dividend yield than the iShares alternative. iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF manages $14.4 billion in assets under management, making it significantly larger than the State Street fund.
IWN delivered a 37.4% one-year return but carries higher fees, while ISCV offers a 0.06% expense ratio and stronger dividend yield of 1.9%.
The iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF focuses on small-cap value stocks while the iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF targets the mid-cap space. The iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF carries a lower expense ratio of 0.18% and has delivered higher five-year total returns.
Expense ratios, sector weights, and portfolio size set these two small-cap value ETFs apart for investors comparing risk and diversification.