
The iShares Morningstar Value ETF seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of large- and mid-capitalization U.S. equities that exhibit value characteristics.
Is ILCV's expense ratio expensive, average, or a steal for its category?
Pro reveals the verdict on a 5-tier spectrum calibrated against ICI 2025 industry averages, with strategy-aware bands so the comparison is meaningful.

iShares Morningstar Value ETF earns a buy rating for its diversified, value-focused portfolio of 381 large- and mid-cap stocks. ILCV is positioned for mid-teen percentage price appreciation in 2026, supported by balanced sector exposure and mega-cap tech holdings. The ETF's low 0.04% expense ratio and 1.68% dividend yield enhance its appeal versus peers, despite likely underperformance versus the S&P 500 in bullish, tech-driven markets.

The iShares Morningstar Value ETF offers a nuanced, tech-inclusive value approach, balancing large- and mid-cap exposure with a 0.04% expense ratio. ILCV's market-cap weighting results in significant tech exposure, differentiating it from traditional value ETFs like VTV and IWD. While ILCV underperformed peers in the past decade, it modestly outperformed recently due to its tech tilt amid favorable market conditions.

Commonwealth Equity Services LLC lessened its stake in iShares Morningstar Value ETF (NYSEARCA:ILCV) by 17.7% during the third quarter, according to the company in its most recent 13F filing with the SEC. The institutional investor owned 115,899 shares of the company's stock after selling 24,846 shares during the quarter. Commonwealth Equity Services

AI bubble fears rise due to stretched valuations. Time to shift gears?

iShares Morningstar Value ETF is a passively managed ETF focused on large-mid capitalization U.S. stocks exhibiting value characteristics. I initiate coverage of ILCV with a Hold rating, emphasizing that it looks superior to IVE, mainly because of a more comfortable expense ratio of 4 bps. Heavy in financials and IT, ILCV offers stronger value characteristics than IVE, but maximalists should take a closer look at RPV.