Loading…
Loading…
The Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF is designed to achieve investment returns that closely parallel the performance of the iSTOXX Developed and Emerging Markets ex USA PK VN Real Estate Index, prior to any deductions for fees and expenses.
Is HAUZ's expense ratio expensive, average, or a steal for its category?
Pro reveals the verdict on a 5-tier spectrum calibrated against ICI 2025 industry averages, with strategy-aware bands so the comparison is meaningful.
RWR delivered higher returns over the past one- and five-year periods, while HAUZ offers lower fees and broader diversification.
iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) provides exposure to both U.S. and international real estate markets, while Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ) focuses solely on regions outside the U.S. HAUZ carries a lower expense ratio of 0.1% and offers a higher dividend yield than its iShares counterpart. REET has significantly outperformed over the last year, delivering a 16.7% total return compared to 1.5% for the Xtrackers fund.
VNQ dominates on returns with 14.9% gains over one year, while HAUZ offers lower costs and exposure to international property markets.
REET delivered 19% returns over one year, but HAUZ offers lower costs and higher income. Which aligns with your real estate strategy?
ICF delivered stronger one-year returns, but HAUZ offers lower costs and higher dividend income. Which geographic strategy fits your portfolio?