

Federated Hermes US Strategic Dividend ETF is an actively managed ETF targeting "high dividend-paying U.S. stocks with dividend growth potential." I maintain a Hold rating on FDV, as I expect its YTD edge over IVV to dissipate in the coming months. I currently favor GARP and quality factors and remain cautious about low volatility and value, and FDV is heavy in the latter two, which will restrain upside capture.

Geopolitical conflicts are creating uncertainty in the markets. There is nothing markets dislike more than uncertainty, which is why there is so much volatility.

FDV is an actively managed large-cap dividend ETF comprised of about 50 U.S. securities. Its net expense ratio is 0.50% and the fund has $612M in assets under management. Underpinning the strategy is the belief that high-dividend stocks will outperform the market with less volatility over the long run. Managers cite research over the last 50 years as support. While FDV has struggled to keep up with similar-yielding peers since its November 2022 launch, a material improvement in its portfolio-level earnings growth rate is a reason to be optimistic.

Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (NYSEARCA:FDV - Get Free Report) saw a significant increase in short interest in the month of December. As of December 31st, there was short interest totaling 85,031 shares, an increase of 60.1% from the December 15th total of 53,113 shares. Currently, 0.4% of the shares of the stock are

Osaic Holdings Inc. grew its holdings in shares of Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (NYSEARCA:FDV) by 6.7% in the undefined quarter, according to its most recent 13F filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The fund owned 289,522 shares of the company's stock after purchasing an additional 18,220 shares during the

Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF is an actively managed ETF favoring "high dividend-paying U.S. stocks with dividend growth potential." FDV has underperformed the S&P 500 index, which it is benchmarked against, since my previous article published in July. FDV's longer-term performance is rather soft as well. From December 2022–October 2025, its annualized return was 3.5x smaller than IVV's.

With its 2.9% dividend yield, actively managed FDV offers healthy factor exposures, but its focus on low beta has led to its inability to keep pace with the S&P 500. SCHD remains a superior alternative thanks to its stronger factor profile, higher dividend yield, and lower expenses compared to FDV. While FDV has some merits and deserves investor attention, I see little justification for a rating other than Hold.

At VettaFi's recent Exchange conference, asset managers and experts from around the country gathered to share their knowledge on portfolio construction. Brandon Clark, Federated Hermes senior vice president and director of the ETF business, sat down with the VettaFi team to discuss the firm's investment philosophy, the advantages of active management, and much more.
SEC filings for FDV aren't indexed yet — common for recently launched funds. Browse the issuer's filings on SEC EDGAR directly.